|
1
|
- Presenter:
- David Longanecker
Executive Director
|
|
2
|
- Education is a State Responsibility,
- Not a Federal Responsibility.
|
|
3
|
- The federal role
- The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
- The federal interest – competitiveness
- Politics
- The federal investment
- $90 billion annually
- Or maybe only $25 billion
- Why Is This Important to State Policy Makers?
- Harmonize State and Federal Policies & Programs
- Maximize use of federal policy & practice to achieve the State’s
interests.
|
|
4
|
- Originally passed in 1965 – amended periodically
- Domain
- Access
- Quality
- Institutional aid/supporting unique institutions
- Teacher preparation
- Areas of particular federal interest
- Graduate Education
- International education
- Whatever
|
|
5
|
- Current Circumstance
- Reauthorization scheduled for 2004
- Extended automatically to 2005 (normal)
- Temporarily extended multiple times since
- Being adopted piece-meal (not normal)
- Budget Reconciliation Act dealt with student loans and some
definitions
- Remainder remains “in process”
|
|
6
|
- Direction is clear
- Incrementalist in nature
- Authorized spending levels will increase slightly,
- Mandates & Monitoring will increase,
- And this will be realized
- Incrementalism can have BIG consequences for States
- The Definition of An Institution of Higher Education.
- Will spread federal benefits
- Could affect state program eligibility
|
|
7
|
- Change over time:
- Less Focused on the Most Needy
- Less Focused on Students & Institutions & More on Third-Party
Providers (particularly lenders).
- More Focused on Accountability
- Why is this important to State Policy Makers?
- Change can complement or pervert state policy
- Example: “Federal Methodology”
- Unnecessarily complex
- And not contemporary or practical for states
- Definition of IHE.
- New Academic Competitiveness Initiative
|
|
8
|
- Understanding the appropriations “disconnect”
- Entitlements – Student Loans
- Discretionary – Everything else
- Except
- Pell Grants – the Quasi-entitlement Program
- The mythical shift from grants to loans
- Pell – more is less
- Loans – more is more – a larger piece of a larger pie.
- Why Is This Important to State Policy Makers?
- Federal dollars are first in, which gives States leverage
- Few intentionally take advantage
|
|
9
|
- Tried and true tax benefits
- Tax exemption for public and private institutions
- Tax benefits for employer provided education and training opportunities
- Research and Development tax credits & deductions for business and
industry.
- Tax deductions for gifts
- Tax deductions for dependents attending college
- The New Biggies
- HOPE & Lifelong learning tax credits -- $8 Billion (could be $12
Billion)
- Why Is This Important To State Policy Makers?
- You are leaving a lot of federal dollars on the table, both for your
citizens and for your State.
- Some may be at risk – institutional tax exemption
- The American University debacle
- Intercollegiate Athletics
|
|
10
|
- 1992 Reauthorization of the HEA – SPREs & The Triad
- 1996 National Commission on the Cost of Higher Education
- 2005 SHEEO National Commission on Accountability in Higher Education
- 2006 National Commission on the Future of Higher Education
- Why Is This Important to State Policy Makers?
- It is an ethic whose time has come
- States can lead,
- or be led.
|
|
11
|
- You are significant partner with the feds on issues of both access and
quality, whether you or they recognize it, or not.
- The federal presence in financial aid and research drive policy
- Being policy smart can make your programs much more cost effective.
- Current discussions will affect you in a big way.
|