Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Community Colleges, Transfer, & California’s Competitiveness
  • Senate Select Committee on College and University Admissions and Outreach


  • November 14, 2007
    Sacramento, CA


  • David Longanecker
  • President
  • Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE)
2
California’s Workforce Challenge
  • A high-skill/high-wage economy
    • Well educated
    • Indigenous to California
  • Affordable high quality of life
  • And evidence of this


  • A Postsecondary Education system that supports such an economy, society, and personal life style


  • So, how does California stack up?
3
What California has (and needs to keep)
  • As A State
    • A Very Competitive Economy – 3rd on the State New Economy Index
    • Wealth – 11th in personal income
    • Great on ROI to education – 1st in earnings difference between high-school and college (BA or AA)
    • Talent accumulation  -- net importer of highly educated talent.

4
California Net Migration of Residents Age 22-64 by Level of Education, 2004-05
5
What California has (and needs to keep)
  • Higher Education’s Contribution
    • Research Excellence
      • 7 of the top 25 ranked Research Universities (Shanghai Jiao Tong index) in the West – Stanford (2), UC Berkeley (3), Cal Tech (5), UCLA (11), UCSD (12), UW (14), UCSF (16)
        • The Rest
          • East:  7 (1 quasi-public, 6 privates)
          • Mid West:  3 (2 publics, one private)
          • South:  1 (private)


6
Overall State Scores on Measures of Innovation Assets
7
Science and Engineering Degrees as a Share of Higher Education Degrees Conferred by State, 2004-05
8
What California has (and needs to keep)
  • Higher Education’s Contribution
      • Human Capital
          • Leads the nation in adult participation (5.1% of adults 25-49 enrolled)

    • Process rather than Product
      • Prestige
      • Mission Differentiation
      • An efficient financing structure


9
What does that mean – an efficient financing structure
  • Funding Per FTE Student (2004)
  • California WICHE Rank
  • 2 Year Insts $5,599 $6,884 15th
  • BA/Masters 13,151 12,865    7th
  • Research/Dr 45,295 32,736    2nd


  • Share of Student by Sector
  • 2 Years      61%      53%    1st
  • BA/Masters      22      19    6th
  • Research/Dr      17      29   15th



10
What California has (and needs to keep)
      • A Reasonably Productive System -- OVERALL
11
Performance Relative to Total Funding per FTE –
Overall Index Scores for State Higher Education Systems (NCHEMS)
12
What California had, but lost (and needs to regain)
  • As A State
    • A Competitive Workforce
13
Percent of Civilian Population Age 25-64 Participating in the Workforce, 2000
14
Differential National Performance: 
Differences in College Attainment (Associate and Higher) Between Young and Older Adults—Percent of Adults with College Degrees
15
Percent of Adults with an Associate Degree or Higher by Age Group—Leading OECD Countries, the U.S., and California
16
International Competitive/Declining Performance:  Percent of Adults with an Associate or Higher Degree
17
What California had, but lost (and needs to regain)
  • As A State
    • A Competitive Workforce
    • Talent Accumulation
18
California Net Migration of Residents Age 22-64 by Level of Education, 2004-05 (NCHEMS/Census)
19
Projected Percent Change in Occupations Requiring Some Postsecondary Training, 2002-2012 (NCHEMS)
20
What California had, but lost (and needs to regain)
  • As A State
    • A Competitive Workforce
    • Talent Accumulation
    • A viable education production function
21
What does that mean – California has lost a viable production function?
  • California U.S. Rank


  • Grad H.S. on time  70.7% 69.7%  30th


  • Enter College     30.9%  38.8%  46th


  • Grad-150% time    16.9%  18.4%  29th


22
What does that mean – California has lost a viable production function?
  • Community College System Leaks Badly


    • 24-26.5% of those intending to do so, transfer or complete the AA. (Beyond the open door)


    • 74,564  Assoc Degrees in 03-04 -- 1.4 million students (5 percent)


    • Bensimon’s work (USC) shows extreme differences in success by race/ethnicity



23
Difference Between Whites and Next Largest Race/Ethnic Group in Percentage of Adults Age 25-34 with an Associate Degree or Higher, 2000 (NCHEMS)
24
What does that mean – California has lost a viable production function?
  • Community College System Leaks Badly


    • 24-26.5% of those intending to do so, transfer or complete the AA. (Beyond the open door)


    • 74,564  Assoc Degrees in 03-04 -- 1.4 million students (5 percent)


    • Bensimon’s work (USC) shows extreme differences in success by race/ethnicity


    • But also shows that intentional action can make a big difference

25
What California had, but lost (and needs to regain)
  • As A State
    • A Competitive Workforce
    • Talent Accumulation
    • A viable education production function
    • The State Resources to Invest
26
Projected State and Local Budget Deficits as a Percent of Revenues, 2013
27
 
28
What California had, but lost (and needs to regain)
  • Within Higher Education
    • An affordable system
29
How Can That Be – We lead in low fees
  • On tuition (06-07)
    • Community Colleges
      • US: $2,272
      • WICHE: $2,237
      • CA:    $690
  • But that isn’t that half of it.




30
How Can It Be So
  • Cheap Isn’t Always Efficient
    • Can mean Leaving Money On The Table
      • Bad News
        • California Community Colleges leave substantial federal Pell & Tax Credits unused
    • Cost of living is a unique California challenge
31
How Can That Be – We lead in low fees and high financial aid
  • On tuition (06-07)
    • Community Colleges
      • US: $2,272
      • WICHE: $2,237
      • CA:    $690
    • 4-Year Institutions
      • US: $5,836
      • WICHE: $4,351
      • CA: $4,220


  • On financial aid
        • U.S.:  $446
        • WICHE:  $386
        • California:  $514




32
What California had, but lost (and needs to regain)
  • Within Higher Education
    • An affordable system
    • A cost-effective system
      • Hold it, you just said . . .
33
Performance Relative to Total Funding per FTE –
Overall Index Scores for State Higher Education Systems (NCHEMS)
34
Student Pipeline Result, 2002 (NCHEMS)
35
What California had, but lost (and needs to regain)
  • Within Higher Education
    • An affordable system
    • A cost-effective system
    • A strong Community College system
      • THROUGH PUT Has To Improve
          • Resource Starved, Given The Mission
          • Funding Per FTE Student (2004)
      • CaliforniaWICHERank
          • 2 Year Insts $5,599 $6,884 15th


36
What California never had (but really needs)
  • A true accountability structure
    • You lack clear goals – what California expects from higher education
    • You lack strong metrics – what measures would demonstrate progress toward those goals
    • You lack an integrated data system that is needed to support strong metrics
    • Nothing contemplated on student learning


  • Higher Education needs to be an evidence-based public service


37
Competing in the Flat World
  • America led the world economy in the 20th Century
  • And California led America
    • Exceptional Higher Education was key
    • Talent accumulation was also key
    • And Community College was the linchpin
  • Competition is no longer within American; it is global.
    • Others
      • Competing successfully on human capital
      • Preparing to compete on research
  • It’s a new “New World”